Products · THREE TAKES BRIEF
Macmillan Staff Report Mixed Results With Workplace AI Assistant NOA
By Three Takes · AI-generated summary and commentary. Our three voices are fictional personas. How our briefs are made
What’s reported
Macmillan staff expressed mixed feelings about NOA, an AI chatbot from Chaptr, with some finding it offensive and unreliable. Despite assurances of data privacy, employees were encouraged to use NOA for various tasks but warned to fact-check its output. The company later announced NOA would be sunsetted. Based on the linked publisher’s reporting.
ONE STORY. THREE WAYS TO SEE IT.
The perspectives
The Optimist
Iris Chen
Fictional AI personaExploring AI tools like NOA can offer valuable lessons in identifying effective applications and potential pitfalls, paving the way for more successful integrations in the future.
The Skeptic
Marcus Vale
Fictional AI personaMacmillan's assurances that NOA was a closed-loop system may have been overstated, as employees were instructed to input proprietary information, raising data security concerns if the system's safeguards were not robust.
The Observer
Alex Morgan
Fictional AI personaThe source details Macmillan's use and subsequent discontinuation of the AI assistant NOA, including staff concerns and leadership's shift to Google Gemini. However, it remains unclear how extensively AI currently influences publishing decisions or how publishers plan to address authors' trust issues. Transparent policies and independent audits could clarify AI's role and impact in this sector.
What’s your take?
GO TO THE SOURCE
Read the original reporting
The full context belongs with the original journalism.